Gender Blindness: It's a Nice Idea...Or Is It?
Patricia Handschiegel has an interesting piece on the Huffington Post today about women in business. The idea is the new power women ignore gender completely. I've been trying to blog about this post for a while now, and I'm struggling. Part of that is some angst about an unresolved issue in my life, part is a nasty head cold I'm trying to shake before I leave for CES and part is that I just can't decide how I feel about it.
Obviously, being a woman doesn't consciously enter into my professional decision making. I never think, "As a woman, should I write this story or accept this speaking gig or interview this person?" Who would? And I agree with the sentiments in the post that an accomplishment is an accomplishment and, like Patricia, if you asked my business role models, it'd be a mix of men and women-- although heavily skewed towards men. I work in a male dominated industry, and I tend to pick role models who I know personally. A decade of business reporting has taught me that the public rap sheet on who someone is and what they've done doesn't always square up with reality.
For that matter, most of my friends are men. My husband and I even joke that many of the traditional male-female roles in our marriage are swapped. In fact, with almost all of our close couple friends, I relate more to the man, and Geoff relates more to the woman.
So clearly, like the women Patricia interviewed for her post, I'm not intimidated by men, and I have no problem relating to them in the business world.That is a non-issue. In fact, there's nothing in that post with which I explicitly disagree.
But implicitly I have a huge problem with ignoring my gender. I embrace it. I love being a woman and everything that comes with it. I usually wear jeans, but when I have to look nice, I love wearing dresses instead of lame, boxy suits. Sure, I wish more women were at dinners and invitation-only tech events I attend, but I love that at least I'm one of the ones there. I even secretly love that my husband gets "spouse gifts" like floral monogrammed soaps when we attend conferences. It's all evidence that I've accomplished something unique and that makes me proud. It's like I've hacked the system. And that means others can hack it too.
As the gender blindness idea suggests, I never considered I couldn't achieve things in business because I was woman, and that was probably part of my success. But at the same time I don't think there's anything wrong with being proud of the fact that I can hold my own in a male-dominated world. That I've been able to make it a non-issue.
I also think that in some unknown, unquantifiable way part of my success has been because I'm a woman. How could it not be? Being a reporter and a writer is an incredibly individualistic career. It's like an episode of Survivor. You're dropped into a jungle and you have to use whatever you've got to fight your way out. Not even a great editor can cover for you for long and whatever you've accomplished is in tangible black-and-white at the end of the day for everyone to see. I've long felt like weird personality traits of mine that were pretty annoying from a human point of view, actually wound up being hugely helpful as a reporter. It was as if I was designed to do what I do.
Because it's so personal, I'd be naive to think none of that has to do with being a woman. Women connect with people in a different way, listen better than men on average, are non-threatening and are naturally nurturing. A lot of people tell me things they don't tell other people, and all of that is probably part of why. My gender is part of me, so why would I treat it as something I somehow have to subvert or ignore?
There's incredible power in being a woman in business that we've had to deny so long to prove we're "equal." Most of the powerful women I know and respect are increasingly embracing it and using it to their advantage. To me, that's truly breaking the glass ceiling.
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.

New Book
An unforgettable portrait of the emerging world's entrepreneurial dynamos Brilliant, Crazy, Cocky is the story about that top 1% of people who do more to change their worlds through greed and ambition than politicians, NGOs and nonprofits ever can. This new breed of self-starter is taking local turmoil and turning it into opportunities, making millions, creating thousands of jobs and changing the face of modern entrepreneurship at the same time. To tell this story, Lacy spent forty weeks traveling through Asia, South America and Africa hunting down the most impressive up-and-comers the developed world has never heard of....yet.
Buy it from these sellers
Updates
Sarah's Latest on TechCrunch
On the Blog
- Africa
- Argentina
- Blogkeeping
- Books
- Brazil
- Brilliant, Crazy, Cocky
- China
- Food and Drink
- India
- Indonesia
- International Travel Tips
- Israel
- Media
- Once You're Lucky, Twice You're Good
- Silicon Valley
- Singapore
- TechCrunch
- the always controversial sarah lacy
- Travel
- venture capital


Gender blindness is another one of those bad catch phrases. Don't be blind to anything, that's the key for all of us-- remember/get to know/act like an individuals.
Posted by: lonelypond | January 07, 2009 at 07:23 PM
Gender Embracing might be a better way to phrase all of this. I immensely dislike the term Gender Blindness as it is far too dismissive and obliterating. No one can truly ignore gender- as you've elucidated in an interesting fashion.
Posted by: Agile Cyborg | January 07, 2009 at 08:52 PM
I was going to write a deep comment, then couldn't figure out how to say what I am thinking without some women misinterpreting what I mean.
Which is exactly the point of my thought. Women and men need to think like individuals, not like a gender.
Posted by: Jmartens | January 07, 2009 at 10:40 PM
Sarah, gender remains a real issue in the UK/European tech scene and as such I'd be genuinely interested in your view on this:
http://www.pledgebank.com/AdaLovelaceDay
Posted by: Mike Butcher | January 08, 2009 at 08:03 AM
There's another issue with women who succeed in male-dominated fields by being "gender blind" and expecting that of others: they are accepting that the male-dominated ways of doing business in that field are the correct ones. In race relations, that might be called "passing," i.e. making yourself not what you are (i.e. acting more "male") in order to fit in and succeed.
That's probably inevitable for pioneering women. But ideally, as Sarah notes, women should bring their own perspectives and approaches, and *change* the field as they succeed in it. Indeed: those changes should happen anytime businesses or other organizations diversify.
I recall an episode of "The West Wing" where the (black) top general walked in on a debate about gays in the military. He recalled when African Americans were integrated into the armed forces: "They said it would change the [individual army] unit. They were right, it did change the unit. But the unit got over it."
Posted by: Derek K. Miller | January 08, 2009 at 02:02 PM
penmachine -- I couldn't say it any better than you. I work at a large law firm and have faced the same issue. I feel that if you want to succeed as a woman, you have to do it the "traditional" male way and there's no way for women to forge their own path. That can be super depressing at times... I don't think of it as gender blindness, rather it's embracing the ways of the opposite gender.
Posted by: katherine | January 09, 2009 at 08:04 AM