Let's End Mediocrity in Social Media Too
Om has a great post today about how the U.S. has not only become OK with mediocrity in 2008, we actually started rewarding it. See: auto bailout, banker bailout and every other kind of bailout our politicians are approving. Typically Silicon Valley gets no bailouts-- companies fail, and nimble startups replace them. But that doesn't mean there hasn't been the same mediocrity here in 2008. I'm talking about social media promotion and monetization. Link baiting to goose traffic, following any and everyone on Twitter so they'll follow you back, and the forced vitality that ran rampant in the early days of Facebook's platform. The cheap and meaningless obsession with forcing some metric to show that you are popular, at the cost of actually building something great.
As Scoble and others have been pointing out today, it's now Twitter application developers' turn. A rash of services ask you for your Twitter user name and password and send a Tweet for you when you try out their service. Twply is just the latest example. When you try out the service it sends a Twitter that says: "Just started using http://twply.com/ to get my @replies via email. Neat stuff!" Notice, it's even written in a conversational way, to hide that it's coming from the company. Or hide it for about ten seconds until you see that suddenly all your friends have started to use the phrase "Neat stuff!" Really, Twply?
Make no mistake: This is sleazy and annoying spam, and it's guaranteed that I try far fewer Twitter apps and immediately click away when a site asks for my user name and password. I did a keynote earlier this year where I talked about the incredibly low tolerance for spam on Twitter, because of the intimate nature of the conversations. Also because Twitters are frequently being pushed to your desktop or phone, it's far more disruptive than other more passive social media sites. People give Twitter permission to buzz their phones, because they can control who they hear from. When third party developers step in and usurp that right, it's far more offensive than a piece of spam delivered via email or even via Facebook. It's a sloppy, cheap and obnoxious way to spread the word about your product.
Here's an idea Twply: JUST BUILD A GOOD PRODUCT. Worse than the fact that it's spam itself is how mediocre it is at being spam! Tricking people into letting you use their Facebook or Twitter accounts to send unwanted promotional messages to their friends may get you a near term gain, but that's all it gets you. The startups that succeed in Silicon Valley do so because they come up with a newer, better way to build a business or solve a problem. They find hacks. They innovate. They build something that goes up and to the right for years-- not the next 30 minutes.
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.

New Book
An unforgettable portrait of the emerging world's entrepreneurial dynamos Brilliant, Crazy, Cocky is the story about that top 1% of people who do more to change their worlds through greed and ambition than politicians, NGOs and nonprofits ever can. This new breed of self-starter is taking local turmoil and turning it into opportunities, making millions, creating thousands of jobs and changing the face of modern entrepreneurship at the same time. To tell this story, Lacy spent forty weeks traveling through Asia, South America and Africa hunting down the most impressive up-and-comers the developed world has never heard of....yet.
Buy it from these sellers
Updates
Sarah's Latest on Pando Daily
On the Blog
- Africa
- Argentina
- Blogkeeping
- Books
- Brazil
- Brilliant, Crazy, Cocky
- China
- Food and Drink
- India
- Indonesia
- International Travel Tips
- Israel
- Media
- Once You're Lucky, Twice You're Good
- Silicon Valley
- Singapore
- TechCrunch
- the always controversial sarah lacy
- Travel
- venture capital


What I really want to know is if app developers for Twitter are in it for the money, or if they want to add "value" to Twitter.com!
Posted by: Josh Chandler | January 01, 2009 at 12:43 PM
in my opinion- this kind of behavior does neither. show some class, developers.
Posted by: sarah lacy | January 01, 2009 at 12:44 PM
And yet Twitter doesn't have control of the app market, like Facebook so all the spammers can keep coming!
Posted by: Josh Chandler | January 01, 2009 at 12:48 PM
excellent and scary point josh. that means it's up to *US* to call out lame behavior so people know they'll get a social media black eye.
Posted by: sarah lacy | January 01, 2009 at 12:51 PM
Or at least some type of filter to help people sort through it all, perhaps recommended apps through people's Twitter accounts, if they designate to follow a recommender status update, or maybe a sub section of their account to view all the latest recommendations!
A great monetization model for Twitter potentially!
Posted by: Josh Chandler | January 01, 2009 at 12:54 PM
I agree. I first found it through Michael Arrington, who tweeted that message, and thought it was a personal message from him. The tone was what made me sign up for the service (thereby adding more of the messages.)
Thanks for the article, HNY!
Posted by: Mark Bao | January 01, 2009 at 01:11 PM
Twply may well be a good service, but this kind of spamming is evil and sets a terrible precedent. Not only was it not clear that “support us” meant spam all of my followers, but I explicitly unchecked it! Besides, why would I endorse a tool before even having a chance to use it?
More ranting on my blog:
http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/01/faux-viral-maketing/
Posted by: Daniel Tunkelang | January 01, 2009 at 01:30 PM
From the looks of it, Twply have just sold themselves -- and all the login info they collected: http://marketplace.sitepoint.com/auctions/54573
Posted by: Mathew Ingram | January 01, 2009 at 03:38 PM
I don't think that calling it spam is accurate. If you've opted in then, really, you have given permission. You can opt out as well, so the instance of spam is neutralised quickly if thats what you wish to call it.
There is a third-party app that was coded today that you do not have to give your private info to. You can find it here: http://replies.twitapps.com/
I think that the problem now has a solution.
Posted by: Jé Maverick | January 01, 2009 at 10:11 PM
I like your blog and opinion. You're absolutely right, it's always about the PRODUCT. The picture i get is a tradeshow booth with all the hot chicks and great giveaways. It's packed at first but as you dig deeper, the product sucks and you never go back.
Posted by: al ESCAMILLA | January 02, 2009 at 06:58 PM